Recently I have been to a scientific conference. I am not going to disclose the name and location of the conference since I plan to stay in academics at least for the next four years and this particular conference was attended by quite a few big names in the field. As the matter of fact, I might get into trouble just by writing this piece and posting this online. However I am still going to do it since I am a brave old cowboy and (in a southern USA accent), “I am scared of nothin!”. To be honest, I am bored in the train back home and I need to practice my typing.
Before I start with the experience of the conference, I will talk a little about my experiences of going to “band competitions”, also known as “battle of bands” in some parts of the world. A bunch of bands register to these competitions by sending in recordings of songs that they have written, in other words demos. There is usually a selection committee which comprises “more experienced” musicians who screen these demos and come up with a list of bands that they would like to invite to the competition to play. They bands come to the competition venue and present/perform their songs and then there is a panel of judges who judge these performances and the bands get prizes based on their performances. Usually there is a best band award along with a few others like best vocalist and best keyboardist and so on and so forth.
I have been playing in bands for around ten years now and I have won only two band competitions. If I had won more, then I would spend more time in recording studios rather than sitting in trains writing shit, but I am in a train writing shit. Anyway, my complete failure as a musician would be talked about in another post. This one is about conferences.
I guess by now I have given you a vague idea of how band competitions work. A very surprising thing about the selection for the best band and best guitar player etc. is that the prize winners are always somehow connected to the famous musicians in the city/music scene. I have hardly seen an exception to this and of course the two times my band won, we were hanging out with the people from the local music scene a lot.
The conference which made me write this post was my first conference and to be honest I could be totally wrong in my judgement (which I hope I am). However there is always the possibility of me not being wrong. The conference started off by scientists and students sending their papers to the conference and a selection committee consisting of “experienced scientists” selecting the papers and authors that they would like to invite for a talk. The selected authors had to pay a certain amount of money as fees for the conference and after paying, they could go to the conference venue and present their papers. After the conference was over, there was also a judging committee which gave out awards to the best paper and so on and so forth, and surprisingly (or not) all the papers that won any sort of award had a big name associated with it. Does that sound a little similar to my experience about band competitions? It might, but its still not conclusive evidence to say that these two events (or types of events) are similar. However there is more.
Thought the format of a band competition and a scientific conference, in terms of organisation is quite similar, the similarity becomes uncanny when one compares the nature of the content (music in one and scientific content in the other), and the way the audience (which comprises other musicians and scientists respectively), behave to this content. In case of band competitions, the audience loves the music that is either playing in the radio or in popular TV channels like MTV and VH1 at that particular time (This is earlyy 200s and there was no Spotify providing us with personalised playlists every Monday morning). When I was playing at these competitions, the popular bands were Limp Bizkit and Linking Park, some heavy metal stuff and so on. It was the period of shit music (yes I said shit music and if you like Linkin Park and Limp Bizkit then I am sorry to say that you need to work on that music taste of yours, but that’s just my opinion) from the late 90s and early 2000s. Honestly I am so glad that the members of these bands are slowly dying or just deciding to do other things like open restaurants and stuff. I mean even Nicky Minaj (though debatable) is better than Limp Biskit. However we did not feel that way back in the early 2000s during the band competitions. Whenever I would see a band playing a Linkin Park song, there would be a lot of people banging their heads to it and if a band wanted to be unpopular, the trick was to play something that the public was not that aware of. For example a dude could be playing some doors or playing the solo of Sultans of Swing even better than Mark Knopfler, people would still go to those horrible musicians dressing up like Fred Durst and jumping on stage like its a chimpanzee gymnastic show rather than playing music. Still the later were the cool guys since they won the heart of the public.
People in the scientific community are not very removed from the long haired teenagers listing to Fred Durst. This particular community, at this particular point of time, meaning early 2018, loves the topic of Machine Learning and Deep Learning. There were a lot of papers presented in the conference, however whenever there was a paper which used Deep Learning to solve any problem (some were pretty useless problems, like separating bananas from oranges), people just go crazy about them and of course those are the papers are the ones which won at the end.
My train is arriving at the Stuttgart station in ten minutes and I have to get off. I could write a little more about the inferences but I rather let you infer whatever you wanna infer from this. As an ending note I wanna say that I have nothing more to say.